![]() Friday, February 22, 2008 |
Join our E-Mail list! For site information and viewing tips, click here. All content copyright © 2003-2007 Statewide News Network, Inc. Contents may not be reproduced in any form without express written consent |
|
EPA annual toxics report shows decrease in chemicals released from facilities in New York |
||
NEW YORK - The latest Toxic Release Inventory data continues to show a general downward trend for chemical releases by facilities in New York State, according to the annual TRI report issued Thursday by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s in record time. Total releases to air, water and land by industry in the state decreased by more than 10 percent between 2005 and 2006, from 32.9 million pounds to 29.1 million. Electric utilities reported a reduction of 12 percent of their releases from 10.7 million pounds in 2005 to 8.2 million the next year. A drop in emissions of sulfuric, hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids can be attributed in part to power plants complying with a state requirement to use fuel with lower sulfur content and more reliance on natural gas as a fuel source. Overall air releases in the state decreased from 19.8 million pounds in 2005 to 16 million. Water discharges went from 9.8 million pounds to 8.1 million during that same period. The reduction was mainly due to lower nitrate compound discharges, with Eastman Kodak in Rochester leading the trend by dropping 700,000 pounds, Anheuser-Busch in Baldwinsville, with a 495,000 pound decrease, and IBM in Hopewell Junction, which reduced its discharge by 240,000 pounds. Kodak’s 33 percent decrease in nitrate compound discharges into the Genesee River from its King’s Landing treatment plant in 2006 was the result of treating nitrate on site for the first time due to a better understanding of plant operation. The TRI is the most comprehensive source of information about chemicals released into the environment. On a national level, over 23,000 facilities reported on approximately 650 chemicals for calendar year 2006. Thanks to improvements in EPA’s system, the vast majority of facilities now report data electronically and detailed information about specific facilities is more readily accessible to the public. |
||
|
||